[Starlingx-discuss] [Bug] flavor "pci_passthrough:alias" should be required to passthrough physical NICs
Peters, Matt
Matt.Peters at windriver.com
Thu Aug 1 10:34:01 UTC 2019
+Steve +Gerry
Do you have any additional information to add here? I don’t believe we had to setup an alias in the past to do PCI-PT, so is this something that is new to the latest OpenStack nova release? Did we drop some functionality to align with upstream nova (that use to be in starlingx-staging)?
-Matt
From: "Xu, Chenjie" <chenjie.xu at intel.com>
Date: Thursday, August 1, 2019 at 3:36 AM
To: "Peters, Matt" <Matt.Peters at windriver.com>
Cc: Ghada Khalil <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>, "Zhao, Forrest" <forrest.zhao at intel.com>, "starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [Bug] flavor "pci_passthrough:alias" should be required to passthrough physical NICs
Hi Matt,
Based on my testing, the flavor with property “pci_passthrough:alias” should be required for passing a physical NIC to the VM. But it should not be required for passing a VF to the VM. So I think the alias information should contain physical NICs which are configured with “pci-passthrough” by following command:
system host-if-modify -m 1500 -n pcipass -c pci-passthrough ${COMPUTE} ${IFUUID}
system interface-datanetwork-assign ${COMPUTE} pcipass ${PHYSNET2}
Could you please let me know your opinions and leave a comment in the below bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1836682
Best Regards,
Xu, Chenjie
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20190801/3c6d911c/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Starlingx-discuss
mailing list