[Starlingx-discuss] BUG "After stopping vswitch service no alarm is generated Edit"
Matt.Peters at windriver.com
Mon Sep 16 12:33:20 UTC 2019
From: "Yu, Weifei" <weifei.yu at intel.com>
Date: Monday, September 16, 2019 at 7:28 AM
To: "Bailey, Henry Albert (Al)" <Al.Bailey at windriver.com>, "Liu, Tao" <Tao.Liu at windriver.com>, "Peters, Matt" <Matt.Peters at windriver.com>
Cc: "Xu, Chenjie" <chenjie.xu at intel.com>, "starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>, Ghada Khalil <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] BUG "After stopping vswitch service no alarm is generated Edit"
After investigating the cause, I find if the file(at /var/run/.disable_worker_services) exists, then the process monitor will ignore these process that the subfunction type is worker.
I have several questions about this bug.
· Why is the file(disable_worker_services) always generated? When will it be deleted?
· What is the difference between worker type and last-config type? (the type of subfunction)
· Can I use last-config type instead of worker type? (These two are very similar)
I would be grateful if you can give me some advice.
The detail as below:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Starlingx-discuss