[Starlingx-discuss] stx-openstack application applying failed
Waines, Greg
Greg.Waines at windriver.com
Tue Jun 29 11:25:58 UTC 2021
when I cut & paste your output into grep rootfs | awk ‘{print $4}’
I get
/dev/disk/by-path/pci-0000:00:17.0-ata-1.0
the command is basically setting ROOT_DISK to rootfs_device
Greg.
From: Embedded Devel <lists at optimcloud.com>
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2021 8:15 AM
To: Waines, Greg <Greg.Waines at windriver.com>; open infra <openinfradn at gmail.com>; Zvonar, Bill <Bill.Zvonar at windriver.com>
Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Camp, MaryX <maryx.camp at intel.com>
Subject: Re: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] stx-openstack application applying failed
[Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
On Monday 28 June 2021 19:06:17 PM (+07:00), Waines, Greg wrote:
Here is what you need to do … we will update this in docs.
Greg.
# Increase size of cgts-vg LVG in order to increase size of docker fs
export NODE=controller-1
ROOT_DISK=$(system host-show ${NODE} | grep rootfs | awk '{print $4}')
ROOT_DISK_UUID=$(system host-disk-list ${NODE} --nowrap | grep ${ROOT_DISK} | awk '{print $2}')
NEW_SIZE=35
NEW_PARTITION=$(system host-disk-partition-add -t lvm_phys_vol ${NODE} ${ROOT_DISK_UUID} ${NEW_SIZE})
NEW_PARTITION_UUID=$(echo ${NEW_PARTITION} | grep -ow "| uuid | [a-z0-9\-]* |" | awk '{print $4}')
system host-pv-add ${NODE} cgts-vg ${NEW_PARTITION_UUID}
system host-fs-modify controller-1 docker=60
ROOT_DISK=$(system host-show ${NODE} | grep rootfs | awk '{print $4}') fails on my stx 5.0 simplex
[sysadmin at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system host-show ${NODE}
+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Property | Value |
+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| action | none |
| administrative | unlocked |
| availability | available |
| bm_ip | None |
| bm_type | none |
| bm_username | None |
| boot_device | /dev/disk/by-path/pci-0000:00:17.0-ata-1.0 |
| capabilities | {u'stor_function': u'monitor', u'Personality': u'Controller-Active'} |
| clock_synchronization | ntp |
| config_applied | 65c1c5ac-546a-45fc-8d82-e9644f1930a2 |
| config_status | None |
| config_target | 65c1c5ac-546a-45fc-8d82-e9644f1930a2 |
| console | tty0 |
| created_at | 2021-06-26T10:51:25.595104+00:00 |
| device_image_update | None |
| hostname | controller-0 |
| id | 1 |
| install_output | text |
| install_state | None |
| install_state_info | None |
| inv_state | inventoried |
| invprovision | provisioned |
| location | {} |
| mgmt_ip | 192.168.204.2 |
| mgmt_mac | 00:00:00:00:00:00 |
| operational | enabled |
| personality | controller |
| reboot_needed | False |
| reserved | False |
| rootfs_device | /dev/disk/by-path/pci-0000:00:17.0-ata-1.0 |
| serialid | None |
| software_load | 21.05 |
| subfunction_avail | available |
| subfunction_oper | enabled |
| subfunctions | controller,worker |
| task | |
| tboot | false |
| ttys_dcd | None |
| updated_at | 2021-06-28T12:13:20.119581+00:00 |
| uptime | 15240 |
| uuid | 2b237d4f-fc3d-4f83-bdf2-b2689469b89e |
| vim_progress_status | services-enabled |
+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
From: Embedded Devel <lists at optimcloud.com<mailto:lists at optimcloud.com>>
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2021 7:18 AM
To: Waines, Greg <Greg.Waines at windriver.com<mailto:Greg.Waines at windriver.com>>; open infra <openinfradn at gmail.com<mailto:openinfradn at gmail.com>>; Zvonar, Bill <Bill.Zvonar at windriver.com<mailto:Bill.Zvonar at windriver.com>>
Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] stx-openstack application applying failed
[Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
On Saturday 26 June 2021 20:17:36 PM (+07:00), Waines, Greg wrote:
Agreed that increased docker fs is not documented well … especially if you need to increase the cgts_vg logical volume group in order to increase the docker filesystem size. We have plans to fix this.
Yupp seems this is exactly what i need also right now, as im running into the
system host-fs-modify controller-0 docker=60
HostFs update failed: Not enough free space on cgts-vg. Current free space 16 GiB, requested total increase 30 GiB
Greg.
From: open infra <openinfradn at gmail.com<mailto:openinfradn at gmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2021 10:30 AM
To: Zvonar, Bill <Bill.Zvonar at windriver.com<mailto:Bill.Zvonar at windriver.com>>
Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] stx-openstack application applying failed
[Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
Finally managed to deploy OpenStack but not sure what caused the issue.
Increased disk capacity for docker in worker and reviewed network.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 1:59 PM open infra <openinfradn at gmail.com<mailto:openinfradn at gmail.com>> wrote:
I managed to deploy stx-monitoring that require labelling only in controller nodes.
Definitely something wrong with worker-0 labelling
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 8:52 PM open infra <openinfradn at gmail.com<mailto:openinfradn at gmail.com>> wrote:
Here is more information about the issue.
http://paste.openstack.org/show/806872/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/paste.openstack.org/show/806872/__;!!AjveYdw8EvQ!IqDey86XgSsb-XFryEq6evajkKBtzO0iqfvrTOhcD3HlCvV9FgK4c5QV8wSfkRJp74Y$>
Then I set the openstack-compute-node label to the controller-0 and re-apply stx-openstack (just to test).
Then stx-openstack applying progress continued up to 55%.
I can lock/unlcok the worker-0 via controller nodes. So, it should not be a problem with management network.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 4:40 PM open infra <openinfradn at gmail.com<mailto:openinfradn at gmail.com>> wrote:
thank you Bill and Thiago.
Now I have switched to Release 5.
Don't we need to set following labels for release 5 deployment if we supposed to deploy stx-openstack?
for controllers:
system host-label-assign $NODE openstack-control-plane=enabled
For worker nodes:
system host-label-assign $NODE openstack-compute-node=enabled
system host-label-assign $NODE openvswitch=enabled
Because these labels are not visible in the release 5 installation guide.
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 9:11 PM Zvonar, Bill <Bill.Zvonar at windriver.com<mailto:Bill.Zvonar at windriver.com>> wrote:
Hi again Danishka, we discussed this too.
It was suggested that you check /var/logs/armada to see if there are any Armada startup logs that’d help understand what’s going on.
Thanks, Bill...
From: open infra <openinfradn at gmail.com<mailto:openinfradn at gmail.com>>
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2021 2:28 AM
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] stx-openstack application applying failed
[Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
Hi,
I have deployed StarlingX R4 (bare metal dedicated storage installation).
stx-openstack application applying was failed.
When I retrieve openstack pods, I can see the status osh-openstack-garbd-garbd-7d4957d9f4-kz95v is pending.
I have re-uploaded stx-openstack but the same results.
I highly appreciate it if someone can help to fix resolve this matter as we have a demo next week.
More details available here.
describe pod osh-openstack-garbd-garbd
http://paste.openstack.org/show/805587/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/paste.openstack.org/show/805587/__;!!AjveYdw8EvQ!IP_slcx9_D_pSzhjpom6niaG_xdFTyB63HZ2yV5p24SAYzk2f4dmWqMTpvLFhtiucGoh$>
describe nodes http://paste.openstack.org/show/805589/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/paste.openstack.org/show/805589/__;!!AjveYdw8EvQ!IP_slcx9_D_pSzhjpom6niaG_xdFTyB63HZ2yV5p24SAYzk2f4dmWqMTpvLFht7VU1um$>
Regards,
Danishka
--
Sent with Vivaldi Mail. Download Vivaldi for free at vivaldi.com<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/vivaldi.com__;!!AjveYdw8EvQ!Kbxgv5BsZhAoZvkbltiAc5Pyqy-5iUhxTbLCvA6Vwg6BAWOrtRaJKjf6dMwe9HeLzaE$>
--
Sent with Vivaldi Mail. Download Vivaldi for free at vivaldi.com<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/vivaldi.com__;!!AjveYdw8EvQ!PJXeYXF3dUb3gTymFwQS4n1pTNbyEnCGKt_N1hVjTM58QJFinv8JkhACiyycLwXm6Hc$>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20210629/efcddc88/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Starlingx-discuss
mailing list