[Starlingx-discuss] [Build] Input Needed - stx-nova build issue on r/stx.7.0

Scott Little scott.little at windriver.com
Mon May 29 14:46:39 UTC 2023


Replies inline below,

Scott

On 2023-05-24 12:38, Waines, Greg wrote:
> Technically STX7 is not EOL until Sep 2023.
> Would be nice to keep it build-able for another 4x months.
>
> Is there another option to rollback the move to gitlab's copy of the spice-html5, in STX 7.0 ?
[SL] The github URL was deleted.  There is no going back.
>
> For option 4), would it only be stx-nova that would be unbuildable for 4x months ?
[SL] Correct.
>
> Greg.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Little <scott.little at windriver.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 10:30 AM
> To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [Build] Input Needed - stx-nova build issue on r/stx.7.0
>
> Branch r/stx.7.0 can build ISO's, but container builds remain broken on stx-nova.
>
> stx-nova's issues started with spice-html5.  The first issue was spice-html5's github repo, forcing a move to gitlab's copy of the spice-html5.  The move to gitlab went smoothly for debian (master and r/stx.8.0), but is failing to clone from r/stx.7.0 centos.  It appears gitlab requires a newer version git.  Centos is using version 1.8.x.
> Debain is using a version 2.x.x.
>
> We have a few options:
>
> 1) r/stx.7.0 needs to find a way to inject a newer version of git into the Loci CentOS container that stx-nova is based on.  A tricky thing to fix.
>
> 2) Move to a newer version of Centos across all Loci images, Prohibitive cost.
>
> 3) Discontinue container builds for r/stx.7.0
>
> 4) Selectively discontinue builds of stx-nova and any other image needing spice-html5 for r/stx.7.0
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Scott
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io



More information about the Starlingx-discuss mailing list