[Starlingx-discuss] RFC: StarlingX release cadence proposal

[Hu, Yong]

Okay, understood. We would get consensus by mailing list and IRC.

I am thinking how we make the discussion efficient.  
For example, probably before kicking off the discussion, we need to create a "story" in which we at least describe what the requirement is about and why we need it.

Regards,
Yong


On 28/06/2018, 9:26 PM, "Dean Troyer" <dtroyer at gmail.com> wrote:

    On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 7:51 PM, Hu, Yong <yong.hu at intel.com> wrote:
    > Given we have a planning board, what would be the mechanism to vote the
    > contents (stories) as the targets of monthly release or quarterly release?
    
    To be clear, we don't really have a planning board.  There is no
    official governance yet.  What we do have is consensus among the two
    primary groups (Wind River and Intel) involved in the project before
    the public release to continue our work openly in basically our
    current fashion until we do have governance.
    
    My brain parses that as our mechanism is now to have the discussions
    here (on the mailing list) and in IRC to find the consensus for the
    questions that come up, like the topic Bruce is raising in this
    thread.
    
    dt
    
    P.S. We still have "the weekly meeting problem" (this is the call on
    Wednesday evening UTC that Bruce refers to) that has yet to be solved.
    The transition from the current practice to a new one is not going to
    be instant and I think we can learn a lot from the experiences of
    other communities (contrast current OpenStack and Kubernetes practices
    for example) but in the end I fear we will have to learn these lessons
    the long way around.
    
    -- 
    
    Dean Troyer
    dtroyer at gmail.com