[Starlingx-discuss] Community Call (Sep 11, 2019)

Jones, Bruce E bruce.e.jones at intel.com
Mon Sep 16 17:38:00 UTC 2019


It turns out that when you're gone for two months, you miss things.  The docs team has this all well in hand, and I wasn't aware of how they are handling it.  My apologies and a tip of the hat to them.

Story: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2006289 has all the info on the current gaps in the documentation.

        brucej

-----Original Message-----
From: Jones, Bruce E 
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2019 10:31 AM
To: Zvonar, Bill <Bill.Zvonar at windriver.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: RE: Community Call (Sep 11, 2019)

Re: my AR below - the work items in the documentation can be found here: [1].

The gaps in the documentation tree used to be self-documenting - there were many placeholder documents showing where docs are needed.  While I was out, these stub documents were deleted.

Why?  And if they were deleted, why didn't someone create Stories for them?  Now we're going to have to re-create all of that.

         Brucej

[1] https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/list?status=active&project_group_id=86&tags=stx.docs

-----Original Message-----
From: Zvonar, Bill [mailto:Bill.Zvonar at windriver.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 8:28 AM
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Community Call (Sep 11, 2019)

Notes from today's meeting...

- standing topics
    - any reviews that need attention?
        - nothing this week 
    - sanity - any reds since last call? 
        - nope 
    - any unanswered calls for assistance on the mailing list? 
        - issue with running on ansible playbook - Saichandu/Pavan from Calsoft: nothing on mailing list 
             - Saichandu/Pavan to re-send to the mailing list, it doesn't seem to be there 
    - offline installation for StarlingX R2.0 http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2019-September/005909.html
        - we don't seem to have this documented yet
        - raises the general issue of how we get features documented - there were relevant features in 2.0 (private docker registry, docker proxy)
        - there's a 3.0 task list that Mike's tracking: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2006289
        - Cindy suggested a per-story task for capturing user documentation 
        - Don suggested adding the docs repo to the manifest for repo sync - makes it visible 
        - AR: Don change the manifest - docs, zuul-jobs & test 
        - AR: Bruce identify the feature documentation gaps 
        - Ildiko suggested documenting the process of adding customer documentation to the contributor guide 
        - AR: Ildiko will look into this 
        - vm boot from big size image timeout: vm boot from big size image timeout http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2019-September/005910.html
        - he's in Forrest's team - Forrest to check if this got sorted out 

- 3.0 milestone-2 (Ghada)
    - decent progress
    - Code Merge Dates
        - A few features have merge dates beyong MS-3: Containerize Ceph, Containerize OVS-DPDK, B&R for openstack (likely won't make stx.3.0), DC for openstack (won't make stx.3.0)
        - Agreed that Feature Test can be lag MS-3 by two weeks (Oct 30)
        - Action: Ada to review and confirm that most features can come in by that date
        - The current exception is Containerized Ceph. Current Feature Test Date: Nov 8

- repo restructuring - http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2019-September/005938.html
        - all done except for the to-be-renamed system-client (nee: cgcs-client)
        - AR: Build Team to sort out how/when to finish this off - some options are available 
        - project sub-team re-alignment - sgw
        - reviews are in progress 
        - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/680514/
        - need to close on this in the next 1-2 weeks for it to be in effect for the upcoming election
        - AR: something! 
- release notes - don't close a feature w/out doing release notes! (per release team meeting last week)
        - when code is changed that impacts our Documentation, should the person making the change also change the documents? - http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2019-September/005925.html
- Root Ara report removed from Zuul Jobs - Clark Boylan email http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2019-September/005931.html
        - no comments on this 
- server usage audit log API in Nova - Dean's email http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2019-September/005951.html
        - per Dean, we're ok (based on input from Gerry Kopec)
        - Dean further noted that this *was* in an OpenStack patch that didn't get upstreamed to Nova 
- StarlingX Beijing meetup - Sep 20th - Cindy's email http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2019-September/005956.html

- Open Action Required (AR) Summary
        - (see https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-status-archive for archived actions)

- <date task was assigned> -- <owner> -- <description + comments>
        - July 31, 2019 -- Ada/Numan -- combine sanity runs/reports 
            - Sep 11/19: proposal was presented yesterday in the test meeting - working on getting Pytest running 
            - Aug 14/19: they started discussing how to do this, a formal proposal is pending 
            - Aug 7/19: Numan: will discuss w/ Ada this week, won't start until after 2.0 
            - Ada: Ada's team will do both, Numan will do RC1 and occasionally Master - it'll be run daily on both, for now anyways 
            - if there are issues running on the virtualized environment, which branch should we focus on - <add here>
        - June 26, 2019 -- Numan/Yang -- arrange an automation framework info session for the Community 
            - Sep 11/19: Cindy asked about the newly created stx-test repo - Al noted that Don just adding this to the manifest & anyone can contribute
            - Numan: it's in progress, plan to do it after 2.0 (or right near the end) - any Q&A before then will be appreciated 
            - Ada noted that they've started to look at it a bit  
        - June 26, 2019 -- Abraham -- provide a forecast for providing a Docker image list
            - Aug 21/19: Bill to ask Abraham for an update 
            - per http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2019-June/005063.html
            - July 3: opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1834504, assigned to build team (Abraham)
        - June 5, 2019 --- <COMMUNITY> -- provide requirements/input on Community Activity Dashboard (see notes from June 5 meeting)
            - Sep 5: Thierry added "Individual Contributor" page, see his email http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2019-September/005913.html
            - see https://starlingx.biterg.io/ & https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-bitergia
            - Aug 14: several updates from Thierry on the stx-bitergia etherpad 
            - July 3: see updates on stx-bitergia etherpad 
            - June 19: added github repos & ansible-playbooks repo; request to see which commits a contributor has done 
        - May 8, 2019 -- <LOOKING FOR A VOLUNTEER> -- follow up with CENGN on storage for really large files for reference in Launchpads
            - Aug 21/19: Bill to ask the Build team to be tracking this as well, if they're not already 
            - Aug 14: CENGN ready to do a trial - need a volunteer to work on this with CENGN (probably ~2-3 days of effort over a few weeks) - need to make sure that it's only StarlingX stuff being put there, some kind of monitoring job to do cleanup, etc. 
            - July 31: CENGN is setting up a PoC for us, no firm date 
            - July 24: waiting on CENGN
            - July 3: Frank reached out to CENGN, no response yet
            - June 5: team feels xv/split is cumbersome, max LP attach size is ~60M
            - OSF can't change LP directly ? it's owned by Canonical; maybe use http://paste.openstack.org/ ?
            - Frank to talk to CENGN about them providing the needed storage 
            - May 29: Bruce followed up with the OSF team, the suggested using xv & split to permit logs to be stored within LP's size limits

-----Original Message-----
From: Zvonar, Bill 
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 7:17 AM
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Community Call (Sep 11, 2019)

Hi folks, reminder of the Community call coming up later today.

Topics on the agenda include these - feel free to add more at [0].

- 3.0 milestone-2
- repo restructuring - http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2019-September/005938.html
- release notes - don't close a feature w/out doing release notes! (per release team meeting last week)
- when code is changed that impacts our Documentation, should the person making the change also change the documents? - http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2019-September/005925.html
- Root Ara report removed from Zuul Jobs - Clark Boylan email http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2019-September/005931.html
- server usage audit log API in Nova - Dean's email http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2019-September/005951.html
- StarlingX Beijing meetup - Sep 20th - Cindy's email http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2019-September/005956.html

Bill...

[0] etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-status
[1] call details: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Starlingx/Meetings#7am_PDT_.2F_1400_UTC_-_Community_Call
[2] meeting start time in various time-zones: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20190911T1400



_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss


More information about the Starlingx-discuss mailing list