[Starlingx-discuss] Updated Manifest repo for r/stx.4.0 - Please review & fire 4.0-rc build

[Khalil, Ghada]

Hi Saul,
Can you clarify the impact of this omission of the content of the r/stx.4.0 branch to date? Once the manifest is updated, will the commits that were being picked up from master (commits which merged after the July 8 1:30am build) in the stx.4.0 rc builds not be picked up anymore?  

BTW, the review below appears to be on the wrong branch. It should be on r/stx.4.0 not master.

Regards,
Ghada 

-----Original Message-----
From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw at linux.intel.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2020 9:50 AM
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Little, Scott; Penney, Don; Panech, Davlet
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Updated Manifest repo for r/stx.4.0 - Please review & fire 4.0-rc build


Scott, Davlet:

In the learning and doing of the branch/tag process last week, I missed updating the manifest repo correctly for the r/stx.4.0, that involved changing the default revision to use the r/stx.4.0 branch.  This means that our current 4.0-rc is actually still building master and not the branched code.

Can you guys review [0] and when it merges re-fire the 4.0 builds (monolithic and layered).

I went back and reviewed the 2 sets of scripts, I had recalled after the fact that one set did handle creating a manifest, but when I reviewed it creates a hash based manifest which is not what we want either. So I believe we need a story to correctly create a manifest for both the branch and for when we create release tags for that branch which will be different. I have created a new story [1] for these tasks.

We should also choose 1 set of branching/tagging scripts so the next person that handles this can know which tools to use.

[0] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/740834/
[1] https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2007926

Sau!

_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss